Monday, November 9, 2009

Project 4

I cant say I have any questions or concerns regarding the new project. I think I am just more anxious to get started and rolling with the design! I am excited to work with a document that is back to back, normally I don't design in this fashion and it is usually not required.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Visual Hierarchy

Given what you’ve read, what seems to you most important — in general — to keep in mind while arranging type on a page or screen?

Given What I have read VISUAL HIERARCHY is the most important thing to keep in mind when arranging type on a page.


Given what you read, what are the 4-5 specific guidelines or suggestions that you will most try to apply as you work with type on page or screen?


Given what I have read the 4-5 specific guidelines or suggestions that I will most try to follow and apply as I work with type on a page or screen, all of which help visual hierarchy. You must always keep in mind size, weight, color, leading, interline spacing and thats just some of the basic things to keep in mind. If you have an image on your page, size and location of that also determines the visual hierarchy.


Was there anything in the readings that surprised you? Anything that you think should have been in the readings but wasn’t?

I think everything and anything that should have been in the readings was. I had a good understanding of the term visual hierarchy to begin with, but this helped me build up a stronger sense of it.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Form revision

When viewing my design for the application and comparing it to the links we read on form design I notice great similarity. The main keys in the readings were to have contrast, balance, proportion, rhythm, harmony, movement and unity. I added contrast to make the form a little more interesting, what I did was add boxes with a drop shadow to create a 3D effect. It also breaks up the space more to guide the eye. I believe my application is pretty balanced as well. There are areas that are more on the lighter side and other portions that have a little more weight to them. Proportion is handled efficiently as well I believe, all of the type is a pretty standard font size of 10,12 and 14. Rhythm is achieved by keeping the same attributes on every page, the same type faces were used and the elements of lines and boxes and that also ties harmony into the pieces as well. When you efficiently group elements and keep a nice flow going in my opinion it almost makes rhythm and harmony one. Movement works pretty well I would say, it reads as any typical application would and it is pretty conservative. I didn't play with great scale, because some might be offended by it and not find the same beauty in it that I would. I'm not sure how I feel about it. I like it, but I would have liked to stress the boundaries a little more and play more with cropping and clipping around the edges.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Reading about type response.

After I read all of the websites and a few of them are quite interesting, especially the lawyer one! When analyzing the questions given to answer I thought of quite an interesting response. What seems to be the most important thing to keep in mind when arranging type on a page or screen is actually something non-type related. Audience and or client. Before you even get to designing a page or layout you need to think about who is going to end up reading your document. Whether you design something playful, professional, contemporary, or something a little more laid back and friendly. These are all key things you must think about, much before you even touch that mouse for the first time!

Given what you’ve read, what seems to you most important — in general — to keep in mind while arranging type on a page or screen?

Given what you read, what are the 4-5 specific guidelines or suggestions that you will most try to apply as you work with type on page or screen?

Was there anything in the readings that surprised you? Anything that you think should have been in the readings but wasn’t?

Monday, September 28, 2009

Typography post

I feel like posting in different ways so this week Im going to post like a Q & A survey you would see in an article.



Anne Frances Wysocki- Given what you’ve read, what seems to you most important — in general — to keep in mind while arranging type on a page or screen?

Matthew Charles Cisz- What isnt important when considering type arrangement on a page or screen! Well first of all, if your talking about page or screen you need to take into consideration screen based fonts like georgia for instance, which was designed for the screen. Nowadays just about any font works whether you are dealing with screen or page. Now other than categorizing you have to think about the leading of the type, which means how much space you want to have in between each line. You also have kearning which alters the space between two given characters, but it should not be confused with tracking! Tracking controls the space in between all characters, or the characters selected. You could also talk about how you want the type aligned whether it be justified, center, align left or align right, it all depends on what your purpose is. Other than that there are endless possibilities when it comes to font choices and weights and sizes but thats a whole other topic!

AFW- Given what you read, what are the 4-5 specific guidelines or suggestions that you will most try to apply as you work with type on page or screen?

MCC
-5 words. Leading. Tracking. Kearning. Typeface. Size. Weight. Opps that was six, oh I lied I appologize Anne. That is limiting options of words to the max, there are so many other guidelines to follow.

AFW-Was there anything in the readings that surprised you? Anything that you think should have been in the readings but wasn’t?

MCC-Well well well, I dont think anything surprised me, but just the repitition of type basics and pounding them into my thick skull! Oh and I couldn't be more pleased.

Thank you for the links, most of them are in my bookmarks now!

Thursday, September 24, 2009

repetition vs non-repetition

With more repetition in shape it is harder to determine a focal point, and less likely to be a recognizable shape.

Balance in white space is also affected if you have a pattern. The more pattern you have the less white space you will have.

With less repetition in a pattern, it is clear which is the figure and which is the ground, whereas the repetitive pattern usually harder to tell which one should be focusing on.

Amanda Throm
Matt Cisz
Scott Lambert

static vs. dynamic

static
-static compositions usually have straight horizontal or vertical lines.
-stable figure ground relationship




dynamic
-diagonal lines create movement through the piece
-curved, organic shapes create movement
-negative shapes help with movement
-variation in line weight
-breaking the plane creates visual tension


post was completed by
-matt
-chad
-laurie